| Overview | Astronomy | Geology | Biology |
| Mathematics | Physics | History | Conclusion |
Biology
Secular dogma claims that one day life spontaneously formed out of a primeval soup and the first living cell was formed. However the simplest single cell plants at the extreme bottom of the food chain in the plankton called diatoms are far more incredibly complicated than Darwin ever imagined. When he presented his theory of evolution cells were only just visible down a microscope and little detail could be seen but now with the electron microscope much more detail is known. There are over 100,000 types of diatom. About the size of a full stop their silica glass shells are made of two overlapping halves with curved, ribbed and corrugated surfaces. The shells have tiny pores covered by a membrane through which water soluble nutrients pass, often arranged in beautiful patterns. Reproduction is by cell division. Each daughter cell takes one of the original shells and grows a new one. Most fossilised diatoms are the same as the diatoms found today. Although minute their incredibly complicated and intricate design is far too complicated to have just happened by chance.
The concept of a primeval soup from which the building blocks of life just happened and then where formed into an incredibly intricate cell by chance has essentially been scientifically disproved as possible. Nobody has been able to suggest a plausible way it could happen in the wild which is not surprising as they have not been able to do it in a laboratory either. This problem has led some to speculate that life arrived here on earth from somewhere in space but the suns radiation would soon have destroyed it on its journey here. On earth we are protected from the worst of the suns radiation by the earth's magnetic field. Evolutionists do not have a credible scientific explanation for the evolution of the first cell. To blindly keep believing that somehow it happened despite the lack of any evidence is bizarre. To continue to proclaim that evolution is a scientifically proven fact is utterly absurd.
Many features of the animal world just could not have evolved gradually by small changes or even bursts of changes as one strain of evolution suggests. Often several independent and complicated mechanisms would all have to start, all at the same time. The level of complication and interdependence is so high it must have been set up. For so much order and design to come from nothing is SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. This is discussed further in the section below on the Laws of Thermodynamics and Information Technology.
This nothing works till everything works principle is shown in the following examples there are thousands more:
Eyes concerned Darwin as he could not see how they could evolve and no one since has been able to suggest how either. There are many different types of eye but they all need a lens, a light sensitive membrane, a form of connection to the brain, and a brain able to interpret the signals received from the membrane. All the types of eye work perfectly for the host animal. There is no indication of the eye being perfected through natural selection or survival of the fittest. How could it as nothing works until it all works. This same line of thinking also applies to the ear and hearing and also to speech and language. There's that coffee smell again.
Birds are said to have evolved from reptiles. However they have several completely unique features that are all needed to work together for a bird to survive. They have uniquely hollow bones, a uniquely efficient respiratory system, enhanced vision, incredibly fast circulatory system and feathers that are claimed to have evolved from scales. Explosions just cannot do that by themselves.
Feathers are claimed by evolutionists to have evolved out of the scales of a reptile but they are of a completely different nature. Branching off the central stem or quill of a feather, hundreds of barbs reach out that have two types of barbules along opposite edges. The barbules from one barb interconnecting with the other type of barbule from the adjacent barb. This creates the soft flexible surface we all know. This incredible interlacing is usually lubricated by an oil that the bird applies when preening itself which usually causes the feather to be waterproof too. No fossils have been found of any animal that has anything like a scale on a journey to becoming a feather. The evidence suggests scales are scales and feathers are feathers with nothing to relate them except the imagination of a dedicated evolutionist.
Bombardier Beetles are 10mm long and can be found in the Welsh Hills. They produce a stable but potentially explosive mixture of two very complex chemicals that it squirts into a chamber where it is mixed with two incredibly complex enzymes that cause the mixture to explode. This is all done precisely when the beetle decides. This enables him to aim the discharge at his enemy. The chemicals are not particularly easy to produce in the laboratory let alone in the wild by chance. The evolutionist's explanation that this very sophisticated and complicated chemical process was created by mutations acted upon by natural selection is irrational. The whole process is so complicated that the chances of the tens of thousands of mutations required to produce it happening together are statistically impossible. The earlier mutations in the process would actually be eliminated by natural selection before the complete design came together. It is far more likely the beetle would blow itself into extinction before this incredibly complicated chemical process was perfected.
Butterflies have a completely unique and fantastic life cycle. They start life as an egg which hatch's into a caterpillar. Some caterpillars as they grow, shed their skins several times. Then it spins a cocoon into which it seals itself and then while hibernating there, its cells rearrange into the completely different life form of the butterfly. Then it breaks out of the chrysalis, its wings immediately dry out so it can then start to fly. In warmer habitats this process may take only 18 days but in colder climes up to a year. The design is so complex and so highly tuned how could it ever come about by a series of accidental mutations and natural selection. It is just simply not possible.
Bats today are hardly any different from what are meant to be the oldest known fossil bats. There is no evidence of any evolutionary path whatsoever. These mammals have two unique features that do not occur in any other animals. They fly using membrane wings and use echo location to navigate and find food. It is not reasonable to suggest that these unique complex features created themselves.
Bees having discovered a food source on returning to the hive they tell other bees the distance and direction to where the food is through various dance patterns. This behaviour as well as other complex behaviours of the bee just could not be learnt by accident. It would need communication skills they do not have. Their behaviour patterns would need to be pre-programmed into their tiny brains by their Creator.
Pollination is a necessary stage before a plant enters the final stage of seed production. Pollen grains are needed to be transferred from the stamen of one flower to the stigma of another. This task is often undertaken by insects but also by wind, water, rain, birds, bats and even snails. There are many pollination mechanisms involving complicated plant and animal co-operation that evolution just cannot explain. Right from the start they needed each other. How did these plants survive before insects arrived? The answer is that they did not need too.
The mechanism of evolution is said to be by mutations in the genes of a parent so that its offspring are different in some way and by survival of the fittest, positive mutations survive while negative mutations disappear.
The fruit fly Drosophilae has a three-week breeding cycle and has been subject to many years of work to demonstrate positive mutations by radiation of the parent but only negative mutations have been achieved. Secular scientists believe random positive mutations are the mechanism of evolution despite the evidence that they do not and cannot occur.
When species of animal or plant can be inter-bred the results are sterile just like a horse and a donkey produce a mule that cannot bear offspring. Breeding experiments may produce a new variety of say a flower or a dog but a new species has not been formed and there has not been any new genetic information generated but new combinations of existing genetic information. Genetic Engineering does not produce new genetic information but a new arrangement of existing information. Under extremes of habitat and nutrition minor changes may occur in a species but if there is any genetic change it is always a loss and new genetic information is not formed. Often on reversing the circumstances the plant or animal returns to its previous form.
The mechanism of evolution is meant to be through small changes occurring (mutations) in the genetic code of a parent that get past on to its offspring. Research though has shown that no mutations are beneficial and a loss of genetic information always occurs, just like a computer program's performance is corrupted by accidental changes in its code. Computer programs are not developed by making random changes in the code but by a lot of design effort. When DNA is reproduced in animals it is done with incredible accuracy with checking, correction and repair procedures in operation. This is seen in the animal world at large in that species are in fact incredibly stable. Even if a positive mutation could occur where would this individual then find a mate with the same mutation so they could pass it on their offspring?
Natural selection is the name of a concept where a mutant is more fitting to the environment so it out survives its parental type. However in practice mutants are far more likely to be eliminated by this supposed mechanism because a loss of fitness accompanies all observed mutations.
The DNA that carries the genetic code does not understand this code it is just the storage medium. The big questions are where did the code come from and how does an animal or plant know how to follow it. To produce DNA you need proteins and to produce proteins you need DNA. This is yet another interdependent mechanism that would be needed to be set up before it could continue.
You cannot turn a wrist watch into a grandfather clock by changing one piece of the mechanism at a time and still make all the intermediaries work. However, this is how evolution is said to have developed all the different species we see today.
| Mathematics > |
| Dr. Kurt Wise |
DNA Uncovers a Biblical History of Humankind? YT(25m)
| Leila Ahmed |
Muslim Woman Dies & Returns With a Message YT(40m)
| Rachel Porter |
She Died & Jesus Showed Her 4 Events in 2025 YT(15m)
| Jeff Allen |
Atheist Comedian discovers God through Ecclesiastes YT(36m)